Page 8 - New England Condominium November 2020
P. 8

8 NEW ENGLAND CONDOMINIUM   -NOVEMBER 2020    NEWENGLANDCONDO.COM  ground-source geothermal heat pump offered   the best “bang for the buck,” says Ed Yaker,   treasurer on the co-op’s board of directors, in   terms of emissions reductions as well as solv-  ing for the aforementioned health and quality   of life concerns. Even though the co-op, as a   “Mitchell-Lama equivalent,” can undertake   what’s known as the ‘alternative path’ toward   compliance with the emission-reduction   standards prescribed by the city’s Local Law   97 (“The Climate Act”), says Yaker, it be-  hooves them to go as far as possible toward   the standard 2034 goals, not only to avoid the   potential penalties that increase substantially   as the reduction measures get more strict in   the approach to 2050, but also because “every-  thing takes a long time.”  “We can’t do anything until we have two   things: one, money; two, HCR approval,”   continues Yaker. \[As a limited dividend co-  operative, Amalgamated is regulated under   the New York State Homes and Community   Renewal (NYSHCR) program, which requires   certain review and approval processes for   major expenditures.\] Right now, he says,   they’re focusing on the money. It took a   year for HCR to even authorize the issu-  ance of an RFP for an energy consultant,   notes Yaker, so while they’ve requested   a determination on their mortgage re-  financing proposal, they do not expect   a timely response. Zsebedics and Yaker   agree that with a projected $13 million   cost for the project, if they can overcome   the financing hurdle, it is unlikely that   HCR will end up standing in the way   of a project that is so necessary—and so   in line with the state’s mandated climate   initiatives.   With acceptance into NYSERDA’s   Multifamily Performance Program (MPP),   which offers specific incentives for affordable   multifamily properties based on the amount   of energy savings that a project is assessed   to achieve, Amalgamated also plans to un-  dertake energy efficiency projects across the   rest of its campus, including installing the   Cozy radiator covers and management sys-  tem mentioned in Part 1 of this story, as well   as two new 600-horsepower Johnson boilers   with combined heat and power (CHP)—an   energy-efficient system that allows the heat   produced by electric generation to be used   as a thermal (heating and/or cooling) power   source.   The Legislation  Depending on where you live, efforts to   enhance energy efficiency and emissions   reductions in your building or community   might be helped or hindered by the laws and   government or utility incentives in place. Ac-  cording to the Institute for Local Self-Reliance   (ILSR), a national organization that builds   partnerships to research and advocate for “an   American economy driven by local priorities   and  accountable to  people  and  the  planet,”   per its website, Massachusetts and New York   lead the 50 states in local clean energy policy  consultants like Egg to warn, “Any property   and implementation, with California and Il-  linois also scoring well (especially relative to  … when it’s at the point of needing replace-  their regions). States like Florida, which lacks  ment, if the building doesn’t replace it with an   policy for renewable energy sharing and dis-  tribution, ranked among the lowest.  The Commonwealth of Massachusetts was   an early adopter of decarbonization, starting  in large multifamily properties approach the   with its 2008 enactment of the Global Warm-  ing Solutions Act (GWSA), setting up policy  replacement with a geothermal solution “lim-  and infrastructure for emissions reductions  its CO2 emissions, which is a big deal for   and conversion to non-fossil-burning sourc-  es. In 2016, Massachusetts Governor Charlie  cooling towers, which is a big pandemic-type   Baker declared a state goal of net zero emis-  sions by 2050. The state legislature has taken  fines and penalties associated with exceeding   up several bills since then in furtherance of  emissions benchmarks set by New York’s Lo-  that goal, including most recently Bill S.2447,  cal Law 97.  An Act Setting Next-Generation Climate   Policy.   The state also introduced a Property As-  sessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing pro-  gram this summer that allows owners of   certain properties—including multifamily   properties with five or more units—to take  multifamily buildings for the future is to un-  out low-interest loans for capital improve-  ments that will reduce energy consumption.  side and the outside, the parts and the whole,   Through the program, qualifying buildings  our living spaces and our living. As buildings   or communities can pay back the loan for up   to 20 years via a betterment assessment lev-  ied by the property’s municipality, which bills  tion of MEP systems should take into account   and collects the assessments through prop-  erty taxes. East coast law firm Day Pitney,  enhance efficiency and curb costs while also   with offices in Boston and Connecticut, notes  avoiding physical contact for operation.   in an alert on the subject that each city/town   council or board of selectmen, as applicable,  availability and price points—in HVAC, MEP,   must opt into the program in order for its  and power distribution systems make energy   properties to be eligible. As of August 3, the  upgrades and replacements not only compel-  communities with PACE registration are Ac-  ton, Agawam, Amesbury, Barnstable, Devens,  legislation and regulations are pushing home-  Erving, Fall River, Fitchburg, Gardner, Green-  field, Lexington, New Bedford, North Adams,  tion, and the current crisis brought about by   Northampton, Orange, Pittsfield, Randolph,  the coronavirus pandemic has, in many re-  Rockland, Wendell, West Springfield, and  spects, honed the world’s attention toward im-  Yarmouth.  In dense urban areas like Boston and New  ily residential sector. We now have what may   York City, large buildings account for close  be considered the perfect conditions for real   to three-quarters of emissions, according to  energy solutions: the right products and tech-  data compiled by the Urban Green Council,  nology, at (or approaching) the right price,   making them a target for their states’ bold en-  ergy initiatives. With its recently enacted Lo-  cal Law 97, the Big Apple is putting much of  tion. “It is a multi-decade transition,” admits   the onus for climate action on buildings larger  Egg. “We’re a little bit resistant as a society, but   than 25,000 square feet, and multifamily resi-  dences in this sector produce about 24% of   overall building emissions. This leads energy   that combusts fuel (burns fuel to create heat)   all electric system or heat pump solution, it   will become a stranded asset.”   He notes that as systems and equipment   end of their useful lives in the coming years,   climate change concerns, and also limits the   concern,” in addition to limiting the steep   “The structure already exists,” Egg contin-  ues. “There’s a lot of opportunity, but as you   can imagine, it’s a complicated mess. But the   solutions are there.”   The Implementation  The next step in designing and retrofitting   derstand the interrelatedness between the in-  and communities take on regu-  lar maintenance, capital projects,   and long-term financial planning,   they should proceed holistically,   taking a cue from engineers and   architects who suggest consider-  ing new innovations like vertical   solar  arrays when  facing facade-  related  improvements—many of   which are mandated by municipal   safety programs and international   codes. Roofing projects should   (or must, in New York’s case) in-  clude specifications for integrat-  ing green surfaces, solar or wind   technology, and/or equipment   that accommodates clean power   delivery from other sources. And any explora-  how ‘smart’ technology and automation can   Today’s innovations—along with their   ling, but achievable. Environmentally focused   owners and operators further in that direc-  provement and investment in the multifam-  with the right governmental and business   backing. Now all we need is the implementa-  we’re starting to get the hang of it.”   n  Darcey Gerstein is Associate Editor and Staff   Writer for New England Condominium.  MULTIFAMILY...  continued from page 6  “Any property that combusts   fuel (burns fuel to create heat) …   when it’s at the point of needing   replacement, if the building doesn’t   replace it with an all electric system   or heat pump solution, it will   become a stranded asset.”                                            —Jay Egg  cember 31, 2021. (As Smiler says, “Hope-  fully, we’re not in these conditions at that   point.”)    But being able to do something legally   does not mean it’s easy or doable in prac-  tice. “It all depends upon the size of your   building  and  the  makeup  of  your  build-  ing,” continues Smiler. “If you’re dealing   with a co-op that’s only 10 units, I as the   attorney could probably run the meeting   for you. If you’re dealing with… a prop-  erty that might have 2,100 units, then you   really need a separate election monitoring   company or election service company that   will run the platform for you.”  David Berkey, a partner with the firm,   has the same recommendation. “For the   largest buildings,” he says, “there are pro-  fessional voting  companies  \[that\] assist   boards and management companies to   prepare for and conduct these virtual an-  nual meetings.” Berkey adds that for own-  ers or shareholders who have concerns   about election legitimacy, professional   companies can set up a secure electronic   voting process. “There are ways to protect   against voter fraud, but you just have to   design it before you send out your materi-  als to use for the vote,” he says.  Smiler adds, “The goal is to make sure   that you can provide reasonable accom-  modations, reasonable measures where   people can vote, that they know their vote   is secure, \[and\] that they know that their   vote is being counted.”  Professional Assistance  Chris Backert has been running elec-  tions and voting for co-ops, condos, and   HOAs (among other types of organiza-  tions) with his company, Election-Ameri-  ca, for over a decade. He tells   New England   Condominium   that they’ve recently added   about a dozen new multifamily clients   throughout the country who have spe-  cifically needed help adapting to a virtual   format for their annual meeting and board   elections.   After voting debacles with previous   election administrators—one of which   somehow made it into the   New York   Times  (www.nytimes.com/2011/07/12/  nyregion/election-errors-causing-strife-  at-lower-east-side-co-op.html)—Seward   Park Cooperative (where the author has   lived for the last 15 years) in lower Man-  hattan has run sophisticated, success-  ful elections for the last eight years with   Election-America. The company provides   secure mailing of all voting materials, tab-  ulation and confirmation of quorum and   votes (including breakdown by the co-op’s   four buildings and other salient data),   and voting receipts to all shareholders. In   normal times (i.e., absent a global pan-  demic), election administrators remain   on site throughout the day of the meeting   continued on page 17  REMOTE...  continued from page 1


































































































   6   7   8   9   10