Page 8 - New England Condominium January 2019
P. 8

8 NEW ENGLAND CONDOMINIUM   - JANUARY 2019   NEWENGLANDCONDO.COM  C  ondominium associations come in   all sizes and shapes. They can con-  tain hundreds of units, or as few as   two. While many of the issues faced by asso-  ciations are universal regardless of size, small   condominium associations do face some   unique challenges that set them apart from   their larger cousins. Those challenges touch   all aspects of life in these communities, from   legal to management to social issues.   A Cozy Alternative  Not all prospective condo owners are   seeking the same type of living environment.   Some prefer a large, all-inclusive commu-  nity with tons of amenities and activities to   choose from, while others prefer a smaller,   cozier and more intimate community.  That   type of vibe is often found in smaller prop-  erties – typically walk-ups and brownstones   – and often in urban settings. Small associa-  tions are not unusual, and indeed dominate   the available housing stock in certain loca-  tions. For example, “if you want to live in   Jersey City or Hoboken,” says Joseph Rosen-  berg, Chief Operating Officer at Atlantic   Management in Secaucus, New Jersey, “that’s   pretty much what you’ve got!”    Small condo associations also make up a   sizable portion of the market in parts of  New   York and in Chicago’s Lincoln Park. Accord-  ing to Frank Lombardi, a Principal with the   law firm of Goodman, Shapiro and Lombar-  di, which has offices in Massachusetts and   Rhode Island: “Small associations under six   units are \[also\] very common in New Eng-  land. In fact, they may constitute as much as   a third of all associations in the region.”   According to Kevin McIntyre, a real es-  tate operator in Chicago: “People who buy   in small associations are usually drawn to   the low common charges. Carrying costs   in larger buildings are much higher, due to   those buildings offering more services. They   may be looking for a more traditional neigh-  borhood as well, something more personal,”   like the aforementioned Lincoln Park, where   brownstones are the order of the day.   “There’s no particular profile of a typi-  cal owner in a small association,” says Ariel   Fox, a property manager with Cornerstone   Management Systems in New York City. “It   has more to do with the type of building. We   manage old-style tenement buildings where   the units are smaller, and the owners tend   to be single, perhaps buying their first unit.   We also have conversions of old mercantile   buildings where you may have say, eight   floor-through lofts on eight floors. Those   buildings attract families and investment   bankers.”   To Hire, or Self-Manage?  David Abel, a property manager in Bos-  ton with national firm FirstService Residen-  tial, says: “Many small condo associations   are mostly the result of conversions of our   old housing stock. The apartments are worth   more as individual units than the property is   as a whole.” Put another way, three condo-  minium units are worth more individually   than a three-family house.  “The problem with small associations,”   Abel continues, “is that they’re small. They   often can’t afford proper management. A   four-unit association has the same ‘moving   parts’ as a 150-unit association – but in a   larger association, management responsibili-  ties are not usually undertaken by the board.”   In a small association, the few members may   be responsible for everything from day-to-  day maintenance, to tax filing, to conflict   resolution between neighbors.   Florin Nenciu owns two condo units in   Chicago. He lives in one located in a 16-unit   building, and leases the other in a three-unit   property. In the 16-unit building, the asso-  ciation itself owns a unit that is leased to a   building custodian and handyperson who   does maintenance and things like snow shov-  eling in return for the living space and a sti-  pend. In the three-unit building, the cost of   hiring people to do chores and maintenance   is just too high to be easily absorbed by three   owners, so they pitch in themselves to help.   Owning a unit in a micro-association is like   living in a private home; if it snows, you bet-  ter grab your shovel.   Abel lived in a six-unit association at   one time. He told his neighbors that while   he wasn’t offering to take over the manage-  ment of the property, he would be willing to   oversee certain aspects of day-to-day upkeep   and maintenance. “The catch-22,” explains   Abel, “is that small associations can’t afford   the cost of management, and managers can’t   work for the fee that a small association can   afford. That often leads to self-management,   or to one or two people assuming the bulk   of the responsibility,” which Abel likens to   being one’s own attorney. “As the old adage   goes, a man who represents himself has a   fool for a client.”   Management Issues  “From a manager’s point of view,” says   Abel, “it doesn’t pay to handle small associa-  tions. The manager has the same responsi-  bilities as in larger associations; they have to   produce financial statements, arrange and   attend inspections, monitor compliance re-  quirements, set up and attend meetings, and   handle communications with and between   board members. The management model to   tackle this problem of scale is to ‘bundle’ sev-  eral small associations together.”   He further explains: “Let’s say you have   four or five client buildings located on the   same street, or within a couple of blocks of   each other. On the same street, you can cov-  er all \[of those associations\] with the same   cleaning service or lawn maintenance. There   are a couple of management firms in Boston   who do this.”   “Typically the problem with small asso-  ciations and corporations is that they don’t   have full-time staff,” says Fox. “That can be   challenging, because what would normally   fall under the responsibility of the super, like   meeting a contractor, for instance, is then as-  sumed to be done by the manager – which   isn’t the case.”   Fox’s firm doesn’t formally bundle prop-  erties for more efficient management, at least   not in the sense of going out looking for   those types of arrangements. But, he says:   “We do have areas where we’ve picked up   a number of properties on the same block,   MANAGEMENT  ISTOCKPHOTO.COM  Running Small Associations   Unique Communities, Unique Needs  BY A.J. SIDRANSKY  continued on page 14 


































































































   6   7   8   9   10