Page 14 - New England Condominium October 2020
P. 14

14 NEW ENGLAND CONDOMINIUM   -OCTOBER 2020    NEWENGLANDCONDO.COM  Write to New   England   Condominium and we’ll pub-  lish your question, along with a   response from one of our attor-  ney advisors. Questions may be   edited for taste, length and clar-  ity. Send your questions to:    patgale@yrinc.com.  Q&A  Flynn Law Group  185 Devonshire St., Suite 401 • Boston, MA 02110  617-988-0633  “Quality Representation at Reasonable Rates - $150/Hr.”  Contact Attorney Frank Flynn  Frank@flynnlaw-ne.com  www.flynnlaw-ne.com  ATTORNEYS  See Our Display Ad on Page 12  Condominium and Real Estate Law  Phone: (781) 817-4900    Direct: (781) 817-4603  Fax:     (781) 817-4910  We may be dressed up, but we aren’t afraid to   get our hands dirty.  www.lawmtm.com  See Our Display Ad on Back Cover  Disclaimer: The answers provided in this Q&A   column are of a general nature and cannot   substitute for professional advice regarding your   specific circumstances. Always seek the advice of   competent legal counsel or other qualified profes-  sionals with any questions you may have regard-  ing technical or legal issues.  Merrill & McGeary  100 State Street, Suite 200  Boston, MA 02109  617-523-1760 • Fax 617-523-4893  Contact: Mike Merrill, Esq.  mmerrill@merrillmcgeary.com  ACCOUNTANTS  David A. Levy, CPA, P.C.    Certified Public Accountants  20 Freeman Place  Needham, MA  02492  Tel:  (617) 566-3645       (866) 842-0108  Fax:  (866) 681-2377  www.DALCPAPC.net    DAL  CPA  Please submit Pulse items to  Pat Gale at  patgale@yrinc.com  Accounting • Auditing • Taxes • Consulting  Worcester 67 Millbrook Street   508-797-5200  Grafton  80 Worcester Street  508-839-0020  Holden  795 Main Street   508-829-5544  M Love Associates,  &  LLC  Certified Public Accountants  Serving Condominium Associations  mlove 2.25 x 2.5 condo association color 9.19.2017.indd   1  9/19/17   12:59 PM  her own?  Opinions are pretty consistent across the   board. Unless the condominium is an over-  55 community that specifically requires at   least one occupant and legal owner to be   over 55 years old, adult children can live   there.  Furthermore, unless there are spe-  cific provisions in the governing documents,   minor children are free to live there as well,   with or without the owner present. The as-  sociation cannot prevent you from leasing   your unit to someone with minor children.   The only provision afforded the association   if it’s unhappy with your choice of a tenant   is to enact its right of first refusal, which we   will return to shortly.  Renovations and Remodeling  Like most other issues, condominium   boards have limited authority to control   what  you  can  do  relative  to  remodeling   and renovations in your unit. Objectively   though, residents should approach this area   with common sense. Owners should keep   in mind that while they may be eminent in   their own domain, what they do may affect   their neighbors’ domain as well. It’s best to   check with the managing agent and the as-  sociation before undertaking major work.  “For limited visibility common areas, you   can do what you want,” says Van Duyne.   “Renovations may require plans, licenses,   and other approvals,” both from the con-  dominium association and other local au-  thorities. “They can dictate it.” Another area   of control which may be more common in   Nevada than elsewhere is in landscaping in   horizontal communities—meaning asso-  ciations made up of low-rise or single-level   units where the unit may have exterior en-  trance and exit. These communities will of-  ten dictate what the plantings and rock beds   placed outside units may contain. If it’s in the   governing documents, the owners must go   along with the plan.  Sales, and the Right of First Refusal  The  greatest  benefit  to  condominium   ownership over other forms of community   ownership structures (such as co-ops, for ex-  ample) is that owners can buy and sell their   units without the permission of the associa-  tion’s board. “That’s the reason people like   condos,” says Koplowitz. The association   board does have the right of first refusal,   though. In the event the board is unhappy   with or has objections to the buyer, the gov-  erning documents of most condominiums   will provide that the association can buy the   unit at the same price the prospective pur-  chaser would have paid, making the seller   whole. This rule also applies to leasing of   units.   Ultimately, as Magill outlines, rules lim-  iting the rights of owners to the benefit of   the association must pass several tests. “En-  abling language in the declaration of con-  dominium is crucial.  Rule enforceability is   determined by analysis of various factors en-  shrined in case law. The board must have au-  thority to promulgate rules and regulations   regarding the use of the property, \[but\] the   rule or restriction cannot conflict with any of   the rights or privileges contained or inferable   from the declaration. The rule or restriction   must be rationally designed to accomplish a   legitimate association objective. The process   undertaken to adopt or create the restriction   must comply with procedural requirements.   And the rule cannot conflict with laws of   higher priority such as fair housing laws,   telecommunications laws, etc.”  What Can You Do About It?  There are plenty of options for owners   when they fear their board has overstepped.   “You’ve got the governing docs,” says one at-  torney, “and the master deed and bylaws, and   rules and regulations and resolutions. You’ve   also got state law. What’s the best way to deal   with it? Obviously, you have to communicate   the issue. That should always be in writing.   An unhappy unit owner can  also attend a   meeting and address the problem there, yet   always put things in writing to create a re-  cord. Sometimes though, simply bringing   the matter to the attention of management   will help to resolve it. An audience with the   board might also be necessary to point out   in the documents where what they’re doing   isn’t permitted.”  Shapiro offers some evergreen, universal   advice. “Board members should remember   that their positions on the board are only as   secure as the votes that got them there,” she   says.  Unit owners can always resort to their   ultimate remedy and figuratively say, ‘Off   with their heads!’ by voting them out of of-  fice.   n  A J Sidransky is a staff writer for New Eng-  land Condominium and a published novelist.   CONDOMINIUM...  continued from page 13  of dollars retrofitting their unit to seal it   off or at least reduce the  smoke migra-  tion or purchase a sophisticated (transla-  tion: it must work) smoke filtration sys-  tem. Or, if they refuse, the offended unit   owner from upstairs can spend the same   amount either retrofitting their own unit,   or engage private legal counsel to insti-  tute legal proceedings to stop the smok-  ing. Either way, due to the costs on both   sides, and ultimately due to the Feds,   states, and the condo association staying   on the sidelines as well, it would be best   if the parties came to an accommodation   amongst themselves.   “If the questioner — the above-unit   owner — does intend on moving, when a   potential buyer directly asks whether you   have had any incidents with neighbors   regarding smoke, either regular, menthol,   or the funky cannabis kind, you should   answer truthfully and accurately to the   best of your knowledge, or you might face   exposure, however tenuously, to a claim   for intentional or negligent misrepresen-  tation. And certainly you are legally obli-  gated to answer truthfully and accurately   to the best of your knowledge, any writ-  ten questions posed on questionnaires.   In our opinion, at least in Rhode Island,   there is no formal obligation to affirma-  tively disclose the funky smoking issue at   hand if not specifically asked. Note that   we are not aware of any such questions on   disclosure or inspection forms. But, as we   typically say, just because you don’t have   to disclose given the doctrine of caveat   emptor (buyer beware), doesn’t necessar-  ily mean that you shouldn’t voluntarily   disclose, given the doctrine of do unto   others (a/k/a the Golden Rule).”  Q&A  continued from page 5  need for window treatments.   “I am incredibly proud to have co-de-  veloped Bower. It is truly where the pebble   drops for smart growth, transit-oriented and   sustainable living in Boston. Bower is named   for a beautiful place and industrious bird that   makes a magnificent nest—and that is ex-  actly what we’ve done with these buildings,”   said co-developer and president of Meredith   Management, John Rosenthal.     Knollmeyer Completes Pine Street Project  Knollmeyer Building Corp. based in   Wilmington, Massachusetts, recently com-  pleted construction of the Permanent Resi-  dents Unit at Pine Street Inn in Boston. The   project was constructed during the COV-  ID-19 pandemic without incident, according   to a company press statement. The designer   was Narrow Gate Architecture, and Saman-  tha Lamb was the project manager for Knoll-  meyer.  Founded in 1969, Pine Street Inn provides   a comprehensive range of services to nearly   2,000 homeless men and women each day.    n  PULSE  continued from page 4  See Our Display Ad on Page 11


































































































   12   13   14   15   16