Page 6 - New England Condominium March 2021
P. 6

6 NEW ENGLAND CONDOMINIUM   -MARCH 2021    NEWENGLANDCONDO.COM  compromise  structural  integrity.  Sidewalks   must also be well maintained, so as not to   create potential tripping hazards, which can   result not only in injury to users, but also cre-  ate costly liability issues for the association or   corporation.   In some communities, particularly large   suburban HOAs, internal roads are a critical   infrastructure system that those communities   are responsible for maintaining (unlike mu-  nicipal roadways, which are overseen by the   city or county). Drainage and maintenance   — especially the repair of cracks and potholes  between the financial health of their associa-  — are just as important on driving surfaces as  tion or corporation and the physical health  fessionally-trained eye is critical.  they are on footpaths or sidewalks.   Another area that should be of particular  pretty much intertwined. While most board   concern for boards is any element that con-  nects their building to the outside world,  control, ignoring deterioration or delaying  require more serious treatment,” says Lynch.   which includes things like windows, doors,  repair of the exterior building systems can  “They have a leak, so they hire somebody to   and balconies. Maintenance and care for these  lead to sudden (and usually large) emergency  work on a specific window. When they do the   systems are critical to maintain the structural  expenses—and special assessments that resi-  integrity of the building or buildings. Balcony   railings must be code compliant for safety;   waterproofing and proper routing of rainwa-  ter runoff must be maintained to prevent not   only leaks, but dangerous structural deterio-  ration as well. Windows and doors must be   competently installed and vigilantly main-  tained to avoid drafts and water infiltration;   the former can negatively impact a building’s   energy use profile, and the latter can lead to   mold, rust and corrosion, and eventual struc-  tural damage.   Of course, some priorities and consid-  erations  may differ  depending  on a  com-  munity’s location and climate. Properties in   New England or New York are more prone   to damage from cold weather, salt (both from  dents may not be prepared for, and to which  that the board will need advice about all these   the ocean and from snow-melt products),  they’re likely to respond negatively. The solu-  and snow accumulation, while hurricanes are  tion to avoiding this is vigilance.  the top priority consideration for boards and   homeowners in Florida. Out west in places  derstand the importance of maintaining these  situation in their building that’s complicated,   like Las Vegas, extreme dry heat and intense  systems,” says Ehrman. “Many boards have  and they demand a simple answer or solution.   UV exposure are the main culprits when it  deferred maintenance of these systems with-  comes to exterior maintenance challenges.    Richard Lynch, Director of Project Man-  agement for Massachusetts-based manage-  ment firm Brigs, points out that “roofs are part  expensive problem.”   of the building envelope, as are windows, gut-  ters, and anything else on the exterior surfac-  es. These systems are critical, and are designed  plete and update a reserve study on a regular   for energy efficiency and water tightness. This  basis — most pros advise doing so every five  should be as vigilant about the physical condi-  is crucial, especially in New England.”   Urban vs. Suburban   Clearly, building design and construction   differ between urban and suburban com-  munities.  But even  within  the same  neigh-  borhood there can be differences in building   type — and that’s particularly true of denser   suburban areas. While we might not see many   townhouse-style developments in city centers,   it’s not surprising to see a glass fronted high-  rise in a suburban neighborhood lying just   outside the city proper.    Jamey Ehrman is a senior engineer with   RAND Engineering, based in New York and   consulting widely throughout New England   and the Northeast. According to Ehrman,  problem areas,” says Lynch. “Obviously, if you   “The difference in systems is from property to  start seeing sinkholes on the road, you’ve got   property. So, not only will urban style multi-  family properties differ from suburban-style  That can help with budgeting down the road.”    townhouse properties, but two  urban-style  Some exterior cracks and deterioration are   multifamily properties can differ just as much  obvious to an untrained eye; some are not.    as two suburban-style townhouse properties  Sometimes, deterioration of façades —wheth-  can. This is why it is necessary for an archi-  tectural engineering consultant to learn the  agnosed by spotting related interior damage   details for the system being evaluated.”   Essentially, the old rule of real estate ap-  plies: While real estate is a ‘commodity,’ it is  walkthroughs or perfunctory examinations of   unlike any other commodity in that no two  a building from the street or sidewalk. Your   pieces of real estate are identical.   Maintaining Physical Systems Is Critical   Boards must maintain a delicate balance  ence—but to catch everything that could lead   of the property. The truth is that the two are   members want to keep costs under tight  often try to put Band-Aids on problems that    “Both new and veteran boards must un-  out understanding the ramifications of this  how much I can do that. I always make every   choice. What might have been a minor incon-  venience becomes a bigger, more serious and  stand a situation; however, even with the best    The first and most accessible solution to  or upkeep situations can just remain compli-  avoiding this headache is for boards to com-  years. The extensive inspections completed  tion of their community as they are about its   for a reserve study or update establish or re-  set a baseline for the health of your property’s  ing a team of on-site staff and trusted outside   various exterior building systems. Capital  professionals who can catch problems early,   project plans can be mapped out based on  present those findings to the board, and rec-  the findings of the reserve study. Supplement-  ing — but not replacing — a full, basement-  to-rooftop  inspection  by  a  licensed  profes-  sional is having management or building staff   conduct less rigorous annual inspections of  your board to keep things in shape and run-  the exterior building systems to look for any  ning smoothly; just a commitment to being   emerging problems.    “There should be regular walkthroughs  lems arise.                                                                  by the board and the property manager ide-  ally every quarter to keep an eye on potential   a problem; you need to repair all the asphalt.   er wood frame or masonry—may only be di-  in common areas or individual units. That’s   why it’s not advisable to rely purely on staff   superintendent or building manager may be   extremely capable and have years of experi-  to potential problems down the road, a pro-   What I’d Like Them to Know…   “What I’ve noticed is that board members   repair, they will find that there are other more   serious problems underneath the exterior —   and the whole property is likely to have the   same issue as that one window, since it was   all built at the same time. They’re repairing   something for a small amount of money, but   it will happen again — it’s a rolling effect. So   don’t just make patch repairs; get a profession-  al, analyze the whole situation for the whole   property, and if the problem is widespread, fix   the whole thing.”   Ehrman observes that “I don’t have any   expectation that board members will have   much if any knowledge about the construc-  tion, maintenance, and upkeep of their build-  ings — it’s all way too complicated. So I always   approach every project from the perspective   aspects.  However,  the  most  common  dif-  ficulty I experience is when board members   have a construction, maintenance or upkeep   Even with my best effort, there is a limit to   reasonable effort to help my clients under-  efforts, building construction, maintenance,   cated.”   In the final analysis, board members   financial health. The smart money is on hav-  ommend a path forward. While a basic un-  derstanding of building systems is something   every board member should have, it’s not nec-  essary to have an engineer or an architect on   proactive  and  acting  decisively  when  prob-  n  A J Sidransky is a staff writer for New England   Condominium, and a published novelist.   EXTERIOR BUILDING...  continued from page 1  Boards and managers should note,   however, that the application form for a   First Draw PPP Loan will require an of-  ficer of the co-op to swear and attest to   the following representations:   • The Applicant was in operation on   February 15, 2020, has not permanently   closed, and had employees for whom it   paid salaries and payroll taxes;   • Current economic uncertainty makes   this loan request necessary to support the   ongoing operations of the Applicant; and   • The funds will be used to retain   workers and maintain payroll; or make   payments for mortgage interest, utili-  ties, covered operations expenditures,   covered property damage costs, covered   supplier costs, and covered worker pro-  tection expenditures as specified under   the PPP Rules.   While the board certification re-  quirement may seem like a formality,   it shouldn’t be taken lightly; any board   member certifying their co-op’s need for   a PPP loan will be doing so in a fiduciary   capacity as a board member, and could   possibly be held personally liable if he   or she certifies false information or rep-  resentations. To make clear the gravity   of the process, the application form also   requires the co-op officer executing the   application form to agree to the following   statement:  “I understand that if the funds are   knowingly used for unauthorized pur-  poses, the federal government may hold   me legally liable, such as for charges of   fraud. I understand that knowingly mak-  ing a false statement to obtain a guaran-  teed loan from SBA is punishable under   the law, including under 18 U.S.C. 1001   and 3571 by imprisonment of not more   than five years and/or a fine of up to   $250,000; under 15 U.S.C. 645 by impris-  onment of not more than two years and/  or a fine of not more than $5,000; and, if   submitted to a federally insured institu-  tion, under 18 U.S.C. 1014 by imprison-  ment of not more than thirty years and/  or a fine of not more than $1,000,000.”   Based on the above, it is extremely   important for co-ops and the officers   who may execute PPP loan application   forms to make very certain that an ap-  plication for a PPP loan is legitimate   and above-board, and does not subject   the co-op and its officers to liability, ei-  ther personally or as a body. So if your   co-op has suffered a drop in maintenance   revenue, rent revenue from commercial   tenants, and/or incurred other costs re-  lated to emergency supplies or property   damage, it would seem reasonable to ap-  ply for PPP funds. However, if you are   not sure whether your co-op is suffering   financially from COVID-related circum-  CO-OPS...  continued from page 1  continued on page 8   “There should be   regular walkthroughs   by the board and the   property manager ideally   every quarter to keep an   eye on potential problem   areas.”            — Richard Lynch


































































































   4   5   6   7   8