Page 8 - New England Condominium January 2022
P. 8

8 NEW ENGLAND CONDOMINIUM 
 -JANUARY 2022  
NEWENGLANDCONDO.COM 
Building EnvelopeYour 
Restoration Specialists 
Since 1981,  
Alpha Weatherproofing Corp.  
has served 
building owners and property managers throughout 
New England with comprehensive weatherproofing 
and building envelope restoration services.  
AFTER 
BEFORE 
•   
Concrete Restoration  
•   
Façade Inspection & Repair   Specialty Coatings 
•   
Masonry Restoration 
•   
Sealant Removal &  
  Replacement 
•   
Parking Garage Repair  
  & Traffic Coatings 
•   
Historic Restoration 
•   
•   
Waterproofing Systems 
•   
Roofing & Roof  
  Maintenance 
•   
Structural Repairs 
•   
Emergency Repairs 
617-628-8888   www.weatherproofing.net 
• 
Request a free consultation  •  View projects  •  Sign up for our e-newsletter 
DAL 
CPA 
David A. Levy, CPA, P.C. 
Certified Public Accountants 
Areas of expertise in Condominiums  
■ 
Cooperatives  
■ 
Timeshares 
ALL COMMON INTEREST DEVELOPMENTS 
Call our office for a complimentary review of your financial needs 
617-566-3645 or 866-842-0108 
20 Freeman Place, Needham, MA 02492 
DavidALevy_E4C_NEC_Sept15:Layout 1  10/7/2015  3:54 PM  Page 1 
SERVICING THE EAST COAST FOR OVER 30 YEARS 
Member AICPA, CAI-NE 
www.DALCPAPC.net 
dlevy@dalcpapc.net 
client—in this case a co-op corporation or a  
condominium association—should be clearly  
delineated. 
 What’s Typically Included 
 The scope of the managing agent’s or firm’s  
work, including their compensation and any  
caps on decision-making authority they may  
have, must be included in the contract. “Man- 
agement agreements are used to exclusively  
appoint the agent to run and operate the build- 
ing,” says Hakim, “from payroll, to transfers  
and sales, to repair matters, to the supervision  
of employees. For example, many boards will  
allow agents to enter into contracts—for re- 
pairs and supplies costing up to $2,500, say— 
without the board’s involvement, though that  
figure may vary depending on the size of the  
building. Not having to stop and revert back to  
the board for small decisions facilitates more  
efficient and effective operations.”    
Greenstein recommends that a contract  
“designates the individual to be assigned to the  
building by the management company,” along  
with “a provision giving the board the right to  
demand a change if it is not happy with that  
person after [they’ve had] a reasonable time  
and chance to correct any deficient behavior.”  
Piekarsky agrees. “You will be assigned a  
specific manager,” he says, “and you will like  
or hate that manager—so you want to include  
in your agreement the ability to interview your  
replacement manager, not just simply be given  
one—especially if there was a poor relation- 
ship with the previous one. It’s also important  
to consider that managing agents leave compa- 
nies, and if your building is faced with that situ- 
ation, you want to retain the right to interview  
a replacement as well.” 
“Another essential provision,” says Green- 
stein, “is requiring the managing agent to notify  
the board of violations placed on the property,  
and of any condition in the building or prop- 
erty which is known to be unsafe, or would be a  
violation if noted by any governmental agency.”  
Also, “a board should be very specific as to  
what they want and need, particularly with re- 
spect to inspections and site visits,” adds Piek- 
arsky. “You won’t get more property visits than  
what the contract dictates.”  
The  length  or  term  of  property  manage- 
ment contracts is usually one to three years.   
Shapiro notes that in Massachusetts, the state  
limits the length of management agreements  
to no more than three years. Services can run  
from basic, ‘no-frills’ type contracts to all- 
inclusive. Fees for management are generally  
flat, and not based on percentages of any kind.  
As mentioned earlier, some contracts allow for  
certain services outside the contract to be ren- 
dered, but may charge the corporation or as- 
sociation additional fees for those services. The  
legal pros we spoke to for this article all agreed  
that renewal provisions should definitely be  
included in any management contract, but  
should definitely not be automatic. 
Parting Ways 
Breaking a management agreement is  
never an easy decision. “Before doing so,” says  
Hakim, “we always suggest having a frank con- 
versation with the upper management of the  
company, and perhaps even having the prop- 
erty manager reassigned. However, when it  
becomes necessary, the exit agreement must be  
reviewed to ensure that a timely termination is  
sent. Generally, a building will have a right to  
terminate upon 30- or 60-days’ notice without  
cause. The building is generally only liable for  
the costs to the date of termination. It’s quite  
rare in a management agreement for a co-op or  
condominium to see any penalties, but again,  
the agreement must be reviewed.” 
Greenstein points out that “breach of the  
terms of the agreement, such as the agent act- 
ing outside the scope of their authority under  
the contract, mismanagement (or worse) of  
funds, or willful default of the agreement,” can  
lead the board of a co-op or condominium  
to dissolve a management agreement before  
its end. As to what legal or financial penalties  
might be incurred, “someone can always as- 
sert a claim against another person or entity,”  
Greenstein says. “The board would have to  
prove there was a breach or default and then  
damages. And if successful, then they would  
have to seek to enforce a judgment if obtained.” 
Massachusetts regulations provide termina- 
tion of an agreement upon 60-day notice, ex- 
plains Shapiro, adding that “if the termination  
is for cause, there is a 10-day notice require- 
ment with an opportunity to cure.”   
 Piekarsky notes that disagreements over  
broken management contracts rarely end up in  
court. “Ninety-nine percent of the time, there  
can be a negotiated resolution. Both manage- 
ment and the condo board would have to hire  
lawyers to go to court.  Litigation isn’t cost ef- 
fective.” 
Proceed with Caution 
When changing managing agents or firms,  
say the pros, keep in mind that you’re seeking  
a seamless—or near seamless—transition. Ha- 
kim relates one not-so-seamless example that  
demonstrates why it’s important to keep things  
cordial: 
“One of our condominiums terminated its  
managing agent,” he says. “The old company  
refused to assist in the turnover/transfer pro- 
cess, and didn’t deliver the books and records  
of the condominium to the new agent. So for  
an extended period, the association was un- 
able to access its bank accounts. Imagine a  
condominium unable to pay its bills? Or not  
having access to its own books and records?  
We worked with the board and new manage- 
ment, and the bank, and we were ultimately  
able to assist in facilitating the transfer of the  
accounts, and the books and records—but ob- 
viously, it took the threat of legal action to do  
so.” To minimize the chance of such headaches,  
Hakim says, “Especially in this day and age of  
digitized records, we recommend that a board  
have real-time access to its files, and also that a  
current board member always be a signatory to  
any account.”  
Management contracts are a critical cog in  
the co-op/condo machine. Even if your board  
includes members with contract negotiation  
experience, it’s always wise to seek the advice  
185 Devonshire Street, Suite 401, Boston, MA 02110 
Quality Representation at Reasonable Rates. 
(617) 988-0633 
Contact Attorney Frank Flynn: 
FRANK@FLYNNLAW-NE.COM 
Flynn_E4C.qxp:Layout 1  12/8/14  2:30 PM  Page 1 
MANAGEMENT... 
continued from page 1
   6   7   8   9   10