Page 16 - New England Condominium May 2022
P. 16

16 NEW ENGLAND CONDOMINIUM   -MAY 2022  NEWENGLANDCONDO.COM  185 Devonshire Street, Suite 401, Boston, MA 02110  Quality Representation at Reasonable Rates.  (617) 988-0633  Contact Attorney Frank Flynn:  FRANK@FLYNNLAW-NE.COM  Flynn_E4C.qxp:Layout 1  12/8/14  2:30 PM  Page 1  ddlevy@roofmaxx.com  5 0 8  -4 4-4  7  66  3  DON’T REPLACE YOUR ROOF…  REJUVENATE IT WITH ROOF MAXX!  DAL  CPA  David A. Levy, CPA, P.C.  Certified Public Accountants  Areas of expertise in Condominiums   ■  Cooperatives   ■  Timeshares  ALL COMMON INTEREST DEVELOPMENTS  Call our office for a complimentary review of your financial needs  617-566-3645 or 866-842-0108  20 Freeman Place, Needham, MA 02492  DavidALevy_E4C_NEC_Sept15:Layout 1  10/7/2015  3:54 PM  Page 1  SERVICING THE EAST COAST FOR OVER 30 YEARS  Member AICPA, CAI-NE  www.DALCPAPC.net  dlevy@dalcpapc.net  governing body won’t\\\] give the building   a certificate of occupancy.”  Refat adds that first and foremost,   when  a  board  heads  into  negotiations   with an engineer, they should come to   the meeting with a few fundamental facts   in hand: first and foremost, the age of the   building or community, as well as any cap-  ital improvements that have been made   already, and when. This information will   give the engineer an idea of which codes   could be triggered by the work being pro-  posed, which agencies will need to be in-  volved in inspections and approvals, and   which elements might be allowed to by-  pass certain requirements or restrictions   because  coming  into  compliance might   be logistically or financially impossible.   Refat gives an example of a lobby ren-  ovation at one of his buildings that had   to comply retroactively with Americans   with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations.   “The lobby entrance had a little step   that the town wanted removed, because   it  impeded wheelchair  accessibility,”  he   recalls. “That sounds simple. But in re-  ality, we had to remove the entire floor-  ing from the lobby to where it connected   with the sidewalk. So now we had to ad-  dress the sidewalk, which had landscap-  ing. And we had to address the size of   the doors—the width and the height, and   what we call the ‘clearance.’ How far will   the door open into the lobby? How many   seconds should it take to open electroni-  cally? Et cetera. Everything we do now in   redesigning a lobby or a hallway has be-  come attached to some law.”  Given this complexity, it is important   to have a point person—someone who is   involved in the project from inception to   completion, who can manage the vari-  ous vendors and agencies and be on site   on a regular basis, and who addresses   problems  or  questions  when  they  arise.   While these tasks can be assigned to the   property manager (and often are), most   management contracts stipulate that the   client will incur additional fees for such   services—sometimes on an hourly basis,   sometimes a percentage of the project   budget, sometimes a set fee or a combina-  tion or charges. Given that most board or   committee members do not have the time   or the expertise to be engaged in a proj-  ect on such a granular level, even though   it’s an extra line item in the project bud-  get, it pays to hire a specialist: a project   manager, an owner’s rep, or a construc-  tion manager who will handle everything   from acquiring permits to liaising with   residents to finding innovative ways to   cut costs and create efficiencies over the   course of a project.   John Dimaras, COO of New York-  based construction management firm   EmpireCore, which has clients through-  one is threatening the safety of a resident or   property, it’s time to reach out to the legal   team.  “When dealing with an irrational indi-  vidual, sometimes getting a lawyer involved   is an easier path forward and less stress on   a board and management,” Koppel says.   “When a board member gets cornered in a   hallway and put on the spot, it’s always easi-  est to say, ‘sorry, but the co-op’s or condo’s   legal counsel is dealing with this matter. I   have no comment.’”  Ciarlo feels that the best time to bring   in legal counsel is at the beginning—before   there are any legal issues that need to be   dealt with. Many of the issues his firm gets   involved with could have been avoided if   the board had retained legal counsel before   problems began.  “Many  co-ops  and  condos  are  run  for   years very informally and they do not   properly follow the rules and procedures   set forth in their own documents,” he says.   “This becomes problematic when issues   arise. Having legal counsel come in and re-  view the building’s documents to see if they   need to be updated and make sure that the   existing regulations and procedures are be-  ing followed will go a long way in avoiding   issues before they even happen.”  Mediation and ADR  Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)   is a process that HOAs use to address a dis-  pute where a neutral party helps the parties   reach an agreement and avoid litigation.  “ADR is great because it puts \\\[the con-  flict\\\] before a truly impartial arbiter of   facts,” Hoever says. “\\\[However,\\\] it’s a little   harder to get things coordinated when you   have another person involved. COVID was   a double-edged sword because \\\[in the be-  ginning\\\] it was still difficult to schedule,   but Zoom meetings made it easier.”   There are two types of ADR. The first   is  mediation,  where  a neutral  third party   helps the parties come to a consensus on a   settlement on their own. The second is ar-  bitration, where a neutral third party acts   like a judge and makes a decision, which   resolves the parties’ dispute. In binding   arbitration,  the  parties  agree  the  decision   of the arbitrator is final and enforceable   in court and there is no right to an appeal.   The  problem  with  this  is  that  there  is  no   real opportunity to challenge the decision   of the arbitrator if one party believes it was   granted in error.  AR Management often calls for a media-  tor to act as a neutral party to hear any is-  sues between a member of the community   and the HOA board of directors. This has   proven to be highly successful in working   out grievances.   But it’s not for everyone.   “Generally, we do not recommend me-  diation to our clients, as in our experience,   it usually does not lead to a successful result   unless both parties are willing to compro-  mise,” Ciarlo says. “When we usually get   involved in a dispute among neighbors or   between unit owners and the board, things   have escalated to a point where mediation   will not work. There are also few cases we   would recommend for arbitration as par-  ties do not have the same protections and   rules to follow as in litigation, and it can be   difficult to predict the result.”  One of the benefits of ADR is that it is   quicker and less expensive than litigation;   however,  it  only  works  if  the  parties  are   willing to participate and agree to bind-  ing arbitration. A limitation of ADR is that   the matter cannot be guided by legal prec-  edents or discovery rules, which are avail-  able in litigation, Ciarlo adds. “Also, many   times, a party will use ADR as a stall tactic   and will eventually decide to stop negotiat-  ing, which will lead to litigation anyway.”  Hoever says that dealing with any con-  flict needs to be direct and to the point, and   the quicker you handle things, the better.   “Keep in mind that the truth is probably   somewhere in the middle of what the two   sides are telling you,” he says. “And above   all, stay impartial and try to build consen-  sus between the two sides.”                           n  Keith Loria is a freelance writer and a con-  tributor to New England Condominium.  NOISE, ODORS...  continued from page 15  CAPITAL...  continued from page 1


































































































   14   15   16   17   18